mFax vs EtherFAX Comparison
mFax vs EtherFAX | |||||
Price per page | HIPAA Compliance | eSignatures | Fax Broadcasting | Fax API | |
mFax | 5¢ | Yes | No | Yes | Yes |
EtherFAX | Custom pricing | Yes | No | Yes | Yes |
Security
mFax utilizes 256-bit Advanced Encryption and TLS 1.2 security protocols for their platform. Aside from being HIPAA compliant, they are also GLBA, SOX, and PCI-DDS compliant. It also implements two-factor authentication to protect its users from unauthorized access. This will ensure that all the data transmitted and stored through the system is encrypted and secured.
As an alternative to mFax, EtherFAX uses a software-defined network (SDN) technology called Secure Exchange Network (SEN). They are also SOC 1 Type 2 and SOC 2 Type II compliant, HITRUST CSF, and PCI DSS certified. It ensures that the sensitive information going through their platform remains protected and is only accessible to authorized individuals.
HIPAA Compliance
Healthcare providers can use either EtherFAX or mFax as their HIPAA-compliant fax solution. The two services comply with HIPAA and other data security regulations, such as GLBA and PCI DSS. Both provide signed Business Associate Agreements (BAA), which makes them legally bound to implement the necessary measures to keep protected health information (PHI) safe at all times.
ESignatures
With mFax, electronically signing faxes is possible through mSign integration. Despite sharing the same parent developer, both services act as standalone platforms. You’ll need a separate mSign subscription, which can get costly if you’re on a limited budget.
As a mFax alternative, EtherFAX also does not directly support electronic signatures. You’ll have to use a third-party service to eSign faxes or sign the documents by hand.
API and Developer Support
As an alternative to EtherFAX, mFax’s API allows developers to integrate faxing capabilities into their applications. The API from this fax service has numerous functions, such as sending and receiving faxes, managing contacts, and tracking fax statuses. Additionally, mFax provides developer support via a dedicated developer portal, which incorporates documentation, pattern code, and a sandbox environment for testing out integrations.
EtherFAX offers a wide range of developer tools, including a RESTful interface and webhooks, which allow developers to build custom applications. They support multiple programming languages for their API integration, such as PHP, Python, and Java.
Fax Broadcasting
Both mFax and EtherFAX provide fax broadcasting features. mFax allows users to send faxes simultaneously to as many as 1,000 recipients via their mFax web portal. It also has a 500 MB file size limit for all attachments per pax, and each file size should not exceed 100 MB.
On the other hand, EtherFAX allows applications to schedule and create fax broadcasts, ensuring the efficient delivery of faxes to multiple recipients without delays.
Fax Scheduling
mFax and EtherFAX both offer fax scheduling features to their respective platform. These services conveniently allow users to schedule faxes based on a specific date and time, saving them time and effort. Fax scheduling will help users manage their faxes efficiently, freeing them from the hassle of sending faxes manually.
Pricing and Plans
As an EtherFAX alternative, mFax has three affordable subscription plans for its users, especially for small businesses and organizations.
- Professional Plan: $25 per month, with 400 pages
- Business Plan: $125 per month, with 2,500 pages
- Enterprise Plan: $500 per month, with 10,00 pages
- Custom Plan: Customized pricing tailored to your needs.
As for EtherFAX, they don’t have a fixed monthly or annual subscription. The pricing will depend on what your specific requirements and needs are. You need to contact them first and discuss the details by yourself.
Comparing mFax and EtherFAX
The verdict of this EtherFAX and mFax comparison will depend on your specific needs and faxing demands. One thing is sure. Both are HIPAA, GLBA, and PCI-DDS compliant, making them suitable for healthcare fax communications.
If you are looking for an affordable option that offers flexibility in fax broadcasting, then mFax would be a better choice. It offers affordable prices that are suitable for small businesses. On the other hand, if you have specific requirements and needs, EtherFAX has the edge, especially if you have fax servers, as this service provides a secure network.
The Best Alternative to EtherFAX and mFax
There’s no denying that mFax and EtherFAX are great options for seamless and machineless faxing, but if you want optimized productivity and maximized savings, consider iFax instead.
With our HIPAA-compliant fax service, you’re not only getting toll-free numbers. You can also set up a custom company fax page and integrate faxing to HubSpot, Salesforce, or WordPress platforms via programmable API.
See the difference by yourself. Choose from any of our flexible plans.
