jBlast vs iFax: Fax Broadcasting Service Comparison

jBlast and iFax differ in how they encrypt bulk faxes to ensure the confidentiality of data. iFax uses military-grade 256-bit encryption and two-factor authentication to prevent unauthorized access, unlike jBlast, which only uses 128-bit encryption.

jBlast vs iFax: Fax Broadcasting Service Comparison

Why businesses choose
iFax over jBlast for mass faxing

Secure Broadcasts

Send fax broadcasts with bank level security to safeguard confidential and sensitive information from breaches.

Advanced Merge

Easily make each broadcast fax unique to each audience with iFax merging tool and hit your desired campaign outcome.

Easy Setup

Save time spent on setting up campaigns for newsletters, promotions, and other business updates.

iFax VS jBlast

 Price per pageHIPAA Compliance256-bit Encryption

Easy Resend to Failed

24/7 Support

jBlast vs iFax: Broadcasting Service Comparison

iFax has a fixed rate per page

With iFax, the standard price for HIPAA compliant fax broadcasts is $0.01 per page. There are no added setup costs, but you can upgrade to the annual Pro plan to enjoy its premium features, such as team collaboration, smart folders, and more.

As for jBlast, the rates vary depending on which country you want to send your broadcast fax. It also depends on the page category of your faxes, i.e., the standard page for sending fax broadcasts to the US is as low as $0.06 with an added cost of $0.02 for legal pages.

“Our organization has been using this iFax service for a few months now, and it has been working very well. The customer service team are excellent, they have been very helpful in explaining our usage and how we can benefit from upgrading to a better package that will cost us less instead of trying to sell us more than we need.”
Shamin R.
Digital Marketing Mentor

iFax is fully compliant with HIPAA and other regulations

iFax ensures the confidentiality, integrity, and security of protected health information (PHI) in fax blasts. The fax broadcast service provides customizable cover sheets with HIPAA disclaimers and signs Business Associate Agreements (BAAs) at no additional costs. It also complies with other relevant regulations, such as the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA) and The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA).

As for jBlast, you can use it to send HIPAA-compliant broadcast faxes. However, it doesn’t state whether it meets other specific industry regulations, such as GDPR and PCI DSS.

“Overall, iFax is easy to use, and I like it. I work in the health industry. It is important for me to have software with HIPAA compliance. It is worth to pay money to be compliant.”
Natsumi M. Business Owner
jBlast vs iFax: Fax Broadcasting Service Comparison -draft
jBlast vs iFax: Fax Broadcasting Service Comparison -draft

iFax has a 24/7 support team on live chat

iFax offers 24/7 live support for fax broadcasting-related concerns through email, chat, or telephone, with dedicated account managers for enterprise customers. It also provides a free demo for its broadcast faxing feature.

jBlast does not offer 24/7 customer support. You can, however, reach out to them through email and phone.

“I could fax documents uploaded in my Google Drive easily thanks to ifax. The application is user friendly with easy functionality.”

Chris F.

iFax allows any member of your team to easily send faxes

iFax makes sending fax broadcasts hassle-free. All you need to do is log in to your web dashboard, select a broadcast list, add the documents or pages you want to send, choose your preferred broadcast settings, and click send. There is no need for manual entries because you can filter out fax lists and sort multiple recipients with a few clicks.

With jBlast, you can take complete control over the small details of your fax broadcasts. Also, its interface makes sending broadcast faxes a seamless and efficient process.

“Faxing is not necessarily a thing of the past. And when you need it, it needs to be quick and easy without the headache of maintaining a fax machine. iFax is the perfect fit.”
Jerry Manager
jBlast vs iFax: Fax Broadcasting Service Comparison -draft
jBlast vs iFax: Fax Broadcasting Service Comparison -draft

Add & sort contacts in bulk, easily with iFax

With iFax, you can add contacts in bulk and sort them accordingly. You can create multiple broadcast lists for different fax campaigns. You can also import external lists as CSV files, saving you a great deal of effort and time. Plus, there’s the option to add custom fields to each broadcast list, enabling you to send personalized broadcasts that resonate with your target recipients.

As for jBlast, it features a reliable contact list management tool that lets you merge and update contact lists for easier distribution. It also allows the simultaneous sending of the same fax broadcast to multiple lists, enabling you to reach a broader audience in a shorter period.

“It is cheaper compared to other providers, the ease of use and its design is very intuitive and easy to use. We personally take care of it a lot when it is necessary to solve a problem or unforeseen.”
Luis Reinaldo C.

iFax offers customizable bulk faxing templates

With iFax, you can send bulk faxes in several formats, including PDF, DOC, PNG, and JPG. There is no need to scan, print, or convert your files for web fax. You can also add multiple pages in a single fax broadcast, which is ideal for sending mass updates.

Like iFax, jBlast also supports different file formats, such as Excel, Word, RTF, and PDF files, but it lacks options for customizable fax templates.

“We have so many people using it and it’s very user-friendly. We have volunteers that are older, people that might not be super tech-savvy. It is easy to train people on it fairly quickly and they get the hang of it.”

Jared Walker, Founder
Dollar For.org

jBlast vs iFax: Fax Broadcasting Service Comparison -draft
jBlast vs iFax: Fax Broadcasting Service Comparison -draft

Reporting and analytics on iFax is detailed and auditable.

iFax lets you generate detailed fax reports for incoming and outgoing bulk faxes. From fax delivery to confirmation, you can view the entire status of your fax broadcasting processes. Its analytics dashboard also lets you use filters to narrow down data and analyze specific aspects of your fax campaigns.

jBlast, on the other hand, has a statistical reporting feature, making it easier to monitor and analyze the success of each fax broadcast campaign. However, it lacks specific filters, limiting your ability to gain deeper insights.

“Great customer service! The Google Workspace integration has been great for our organization. Everyone likes it compared to our previous service.”

Omar C., IT Expert (Non-Profit)

iFax uses several layers of security across its platform

On the iFax platform, single or bulk faxes are protected with military-grade encryption. This level of encryption is secure enough to safeguard broadcast faxes. For added layers of security, the fax service also employs additional protection measures, such as two-factor authentication and user access controls, to prevent unauthorized access.

On the flip side, jBlast does not provide the same level of security. The broadcast fax service uses 128-bit encryption to protect sensitive information. It also purges old transmissions after a certain period.

“Easy to use and less expensive than maintaining a fax machine and dedicated telephone line.”

Omar Steven M., Chief Operating Officer
jBlast vs iFax: Fax Broadcasting Service Comparison -draft

Switch to iFax to get the best results from your fax marketing

Being cost-effective and time saving makes iFax the ideal choice for fax broadcasting newsletters, promotions, announcements, and other business updates.
“Game Changer”

“Overall experience is amazing. We are not submitting documents to government agencies as they are completed without waiting weeks for the mail service to deliver them. Clients lives will be greatly impacted for the better as this has cut out waiting time. The ease of setup and the ability to send fax directly from my computer without having a dedicated phone line.”

Phillip B., Team Leader (Non-Profit)